Octagonal Poker Table Buying Guide: The Shape Everyone Regrets Buying

I'm going to start this guide with something no other dealer will tell you: don't buy an octagonal poker table. Just don't.

I've sold maybe 50 octagonal tables over the years, and I'd guess that 30 of those buyers contacted me later asking about trading up to round or oval tables. The other 20 just quietly suffered with their compromise choice, using their octagonal tables for family game night instead of serious poker.

Two years ago, I finally played an extended session on a high-end octagonal table – 8 hours of tournament poker on a $3,500 custom-built beauty with speed cloth and leather rails. By hour 3, I understood exactly why octagonal tables have such poor owner satisfaction. By hour 6, I was actively uncomfortable. By hour 8, I was planning to write this guide warning people away from octagonal shapes.

But you're reading this guide, which means you're considering an octagonal table despite their reputation. Maybe someone convinced you they're a "best of both worlds" compromise. Maybe you found a great deal on one. Maybe you just like how they look.

Here's everything I learned about octagonal tables, why they consistently disappoint, and the very specific circumstances where they might actually make sense.

Why Octagonal Tables Seem Like a Good Idea

The sales pitch for octagonal tables sounds compelling: they offer more seating than round tables while maintaining some of the social intimacy that oval tables sacrifice. They look unique and interesting. They're supposedly easier to deal from than large round tables while being more social than sterile oval designs.

In theory, the eight sides should provide natural seating positions that eliminate the awkward "where do I sit" moments that happen with round tables. The angled sides should improve dealing angles compared to true circles while maintaining better social dynamics than ovals.

I bought into this logic early in my career. Octagonal tables photograph beautifully, they look substantial and professional, and the geometry seems like it should work. Several manufacturers pushed them heavily, claiming they combined the best features of round and oval designs.

The reality is more complicated. Octagonal tables do solve some specific problems – but they create different problems that most buyers don't anticipate.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Octagonal Geometry

Playing on octagonal tables feels subtly wrong in ways that are hard to articulate but impossible to ignore during long sessions.

The seating positions aren't actually equal, despite appearing so. The players sitting on the "sides" of the octagon sit differently than players sitting at the "corners." Side players face slightly toward center, corner players face more directly across the table. This creates subtle psychological dynamics that interfere with the egalitarian feeling that makes round tables work.

I noticed this during that 8-hour tournament I mentioned. Players naturally preferred corner positions over side positions, even though the difference was barely perceptible. But that small preference was enough to create subtle hierarchy that didn't exist on round tables.

The dealing angles are worse than either round or oval alternatives. On round tables, every seat is roughly equidistant from every other seat. On oval tables, the geometry is optimized for dedicated dealer positions. On octagonal tables, some deals are easy, others require awkward reaches, and there's no consistent pattern.

Dealing from position 3 to position 7 on an octagonal table means dealing across an angled line that doesn't feel natural. Your muscle memory never adapts because every dealing position requires slightly different movements. After 8 hours, my shoulder was sore in ways that never happened on round or oval tables.

The Space Problem Nobody Mentions

Octagonal tables use room space inefficiently compared to round or oval alternatives, but this isn't obvious until you live with one.

The eight-sided shape creates "dead corners" in rectangular rooms where the angled sides don't align with straight walls. I helped a customer place a 60-inch octagonal table in his 14x12 room, and while it fit technically, the room felt cramped because the octagonal shape fought against the rectangular space.

Round tables work better in square rooms, oval tables work better in rectangular rooms. Octagonal tables don't optimize for either room shape, creating compromise solutions that don't feel quite right in any space.

Traffic flow becomes problematic because the eight sides create irregular walking patterns. With round tables, you walk around the perimeter naturally. With oval tables, you walk along the straight sides. With octagonal tables, you're constantly adjusting your path to navigate the angled segments.

The furniture placement challenges are real too. Octagonal tables don't align well with rectangular furniture, making it difficult to create cohesive room designs that feel intentional rather than haphazard.

Why Octagonal Tables Feel Cheaper Than They Are

Even high-quality octagonal tables often feel less premium than equivalent round or oval tables, and I think this comes down to construction and finishing challenges.

Creating eight perfect angles with consistent rail heights and smooth transitions requires more precision than round or oval construction. Many manufacturers struggle with this, resulting in tables where you can feel slight variations in height or firmness as you move around the rail.

The playing surface attachment becomes more complex with eight sides, leading to more potential failure points. I've seen octagonal tables develop wrinkles or sagging at the corners where multiple surface attachment points create stress concentrations.

Cup holder placement becomes arbitrary instead of logical. With round tables, cup holders can be spaced evenly around the circumference. With oval tables, they can be positioned at optimal reaching distances. With octagonal tables, manufacturers seem to just put them wherever they fit, often resulting in placements that don't correspond to natural seating positions.

The edge finishing on octagonal tables is consistently problematic across manufacturers. Creating smooth transitions between eight angled sections while maintaining consistent rail padding is difficult, and most tables show visible seams or inconsistencies that don't appear on round or oval alternatives.

The Seating Capacity Lie

Octagonal tables are often marketed based on their seating capacity, but the actual usable seating is usually less than advertised.

A "8-person octagonal table" might technically have 8 sides, but the corner positions are often too close together for comfortable seating. I've played on octagonal tables where positions 1 and 8 were practically touching elbows because the corner angle was too acute.

The comfortable seating capacity is typically 6-7 players, same as a good round table, but with less comfortable geometry and more construction complexity. You're paying more to get the same capacity with worse playing experience.

Dedicated 6-person tables in round or oval shapes provide better playing experience than octagonal tables that seat 6 people among 8 potential positions.

The chip management space is inconsistent around octagonal tables. Corner positions often have less rail space for chip stacks, while side positions have more. This creates practical inequities that affect gameplay in subtle but annoying ways.

When Octagonal Tables Actually Work

Despite all these criticisms, there are specific situations where octagonal tables might make sense – though these situations are rare.

Secondary tables for large tournaments can benefit from octagonal shapes because they're distinctive and help organize multiple-table events. When you're running 3-4 tables simultaneously, having different shapes helps players find their assigned tables quickly.

Very casual family game nights where poker is just one of many activities might work with octagonal tables because the compromised poker functionality matters less than the unique appearance and conversation starter value.

Tight spaces with unusual dimensions might favor octagonal tables over round or oval alternatives. If you have a weird-shaped room where neither round nor oval fits well, octagonal might be your least-bad option.

Matching existing octagonal furniture could justify the choice if you're trying to create design consistency in a room that already features octagonal elements. Though honestly, this seems like a stretch.

The Resale Value Disaster

Here's something most buyers don't consider: octagonal tables have terrible resale value because the pool of interested buyers is tiny.

When someone's shopping for a used poker table, they're usually looking for round or oval shapes based on their research and space requirements. Octagonal tables appeal to the subset of buyers who specifically want octagonal geometry, which is maybe 5% of the market.

I've helped customers sell octagonal tables, and they consistently sit on the market longer and sell for less than comparable round or oval tables. A $3,000 octagonal table might sell for $1,500 after three years, while a $3,000 oval table sells for $2,000+.

The limited appeal also means fewer buyers are viewing and considering octagonal tables, extending the selling process and reducing your negotiating position when someone finally shows interest.

If you're buying an octagonal table, plan to keep it forever because selling it will be frustrating and costly.

Construction Quality Issues

The complex geometry of octagonal tables reveals quality issues more readily than simpler shapes, making it crucial to buy only from manufacturers with proven octagonal construction experience.

Joint consistency becomes critical because you have eight corner joints instead of the seamless curves of round tables or the four corners of rectangular tables. Each joint must be perfect, or the inconsistencies become obvious during use.

Rail padding alignment is challenging because the padding must transition smoothly through eight direction changes. Cheap construction shows visible seams, height variations, or firmness inconsistencies that make some seating positions more comfortable than others.

Playing surface tension must be distributed evenly across eight attachment points, which is more complex than round or rectangular surfaces. Poor installation results in wrinkles, sags, or premature wear at stress points.

Most manufacturers that offer octagonal tables don't specialize in them – they're usually round or oval specialists who also make octagons as afterthoughts. This shows in the construction quality and attention to octagon-specific details.

The Convertible Octagonal Disaster

If octagonal poker tables are problematic, convertible octagonal tables are disasters. The shape that doesn't work well for poker also doesn't work well for dining.

Octagonal dining tables create awkward conversation patterns because some diners face each other directly while others sit at angles. The geometry that's supposed to improve social dynamics actually makes dinner conversation more difficult.

The serving logistics are problematic too. Passing dishes around an octagonal table means navigating eight direction changes instead of smooth circular flow. Reaching across the table for shared items requires awkward angles that don't feel natural.

Storage for octagonal dining tops is more difficult than round or rectangular tops because the shape doesn't fit efficiently in most storage spaces. You need dedicated storage designed specifically for octagonal tops.

What to Buy Instead of Octagonal

If you're considering octagonal tables, you'll almost certainly be happier with round or oval alternatives that provide better functionality without the geometric compromises.

Choose round tables if you want social intimacy, plan to host 6 or fewer players regularly, need convertible functionality, or have space constraints. Round tables provide the social benefits that octagonal tables promise without the geometric awkwardness.

Choose oval tables if you want professional appearance, plan to host 7+ players regularly, use dedicated dealers, or prioritize poker efficiency over social intimacy. Oval tables provide the capacity and functionality that octagonal tables claim without the construction compromises.

Choose dedicated 6-person tables if you want optimal small-group dynamics. Purpose-built 6-person tables provide better experiences than octagonal tables that awkwardly accommodate 6-8 players.

My Honest Recommendation

After years of experience with octagonal tables, I can't recommend them for serious poker players. They're compromise solutions that don't excel at any specific function while creating unique problems that don't exist with other shapes.

If you're drawn to octagonal tables because you want something unique, consider custom oval or round tables with distinctive materials or features instead. You'll get uniqueness without sacrificing functionality.

If you're considering octagonal because of space constraints, measure carefully and consider whether a smaller round or oval table might work better in your space while providing superior playing experience.

If you're thinking about octagonal for social reasons, try playing extended sessions on round tables first. The social dynamics are better, the construction is simpler, and the long-term satisfaction is higher.

The only scenario where I'd recommend octagonal tables is as secondary tables for large events where their distinctive shape provides organizational benefits. Even then, I'd suggest borrowing or renting before buying.

Ready to choose a table shape that actually works well for serious poker? Browse our complete collection of round and oval tables designed to provide excellent playing experiences without the compromises that make octagonal tables so consistently disappointing.

EXPLORE OUR COLLECTIONS